Artificial Consciousness: Edelman vs Buddha

Artificial Consciousness: Edelman vs Buddha
Public
I am seriously intrigued by the popularity of Buddhist thought, both here (on Twine) and elsewhere (friends & family).
I read about sentient beings living "in awareness" ("we are in awareness like we are in space or in time") rather than the opposite (consciousness as emergent). Some of us seem to take seriously the idea that we may well live in something similar to the Matrix, a world of dream, of delusion. This is sometimes presented as an a priori argument against the possibility of building conscious machines. For some reasons that I haven't quite grasped yet, awareness is seen as inherently inaccessible to computers: we live in awareness but machines don't, and won't, because they just can't...
In my view, spirituality is a natural - but misguided - human response to aeternal basic philosophical questions about the meaning of life.
I started this twine to gather articles, posts and comments relevant to this discussion, both from the materialist line (Edelman-Damasio-Koch-Tononi-Hawkins-Kurzweil, etc.) and from the Buddha line. Please do not hesitate to contribute.

Recent Activity

Items

Comments

Forgot your password?