A Comparison of Microformats, eRDF, and RDFa - benjamin nowack's blog

Description

Update (2006-02-13): In order to avoid further flame wars with RDFa folks, I've adjusted the form to not show my personal priorities as default settings anymore ( here they are if you are interested, it's a 48-42-40 ranking for MFs, eRDF, and RDFa respectively). All features are set to "Nice to have" now. As you can see, for these settings, RDFa gets the highest ranking (I *said* the comparison is not biased against RDFa!). If you disable the features related to domain-independent resource descriptions, MFs shine, if you insist on HTML validity, eRDF moves up, etc. It's all in the mix.

After a comment of mine on the Microformats IRC channel, SWD 's Michael Hausenblas asks for the reason why I said that I personally don't like RDFa. Damn public logs ;) OK, now I have to justify that somehow without falling into rant mode again...

I already wrote a little comparison of Microformats , Structured Blogging , eRDF , and RDFa some time ago, sounds like a good opportunity to see how things evolved during the last 8 months. Back then I concluded that both eRDF and ...

Original URL

http://bnode.org/blog/2007/02/12/comparison-of-microformats-erdf-and-rdfa

http://bnode.org/blog/2007/02/12/comparison-of-microformats-erdf-and-rdfa